Forensic Engineers and Consultants

Archive: Machinery and Equipment

Machine Guarding Resources

So, you find yourself with a machine hazard that you need to guard.  Where do your turn for guidance regarding guards?  Several resources are available for the person who is tasked with providing machine guarding.

The United States government provides resources in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).  These can be found at www.ecfr.gov.  Title 29 of the CFR, section 1910 covers “General Industry” regulations.  1910 Subpart O, covers Machinery and Machine Guarding.  Definitions are covered in 1910.211 and it is wise to understand how terms are defined. For instance, in 1910.211(a)(1), Point of operations is defined by the regulation as “that point at which cutting, shaping, boring, or forming is accomplished on the stock.”

Example of a point of operation

29CFR 1910.212 is titled “General requirements for all machines” and 1910.212(a)(1) Types of guarding, states that “one or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are – barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.”

29 CFR 1910.212 “General requirements” is not the only federal regulation out there.  There are also regulations for specific equipment such as 1910.213, Woodworking machinery requirements, 1910.215 Abrasive wheel machinery, 1910.216 Mills and calendars in the rubber and plastics industries, 1910.217 Mechanical power presses, 1910.218 Forging machines, and 1910.219 Mechanical power-transmission apparatus.

CFR 1910 Subpart R – Special Industries includes, but are not limited to 1910.262 Textiles, 1910.263 Bakery equipment and 1910.268 Telecommunications.  Specific industries are also covered, including Maritime (29 CFR 1915, 1917, 1918), Construction Industry (29 CFR 1926) and Agriculture Industry (29 CFR 1928).

But what about the details of the design for a guard?  29 CFR 1910 (a)(2) General requirements for machine guards reads as follows, “Guards shall be affixed to the machine where possible and secured elsewhere if for any reason attachment to the machine is not possible.  The guard shall be such that it does not offer an accident hazard in itself.”

Here we see that per OSHA the guard should protect the operator from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.  Also the guard needs to be affixed to the machine where possible.  What other resources are available for the person tasked with designing a guard?

Fixed Guard on a Rotating Shaft

Here consensus standards are available to assist with the task.   The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) publishes B11.0 – Safety of Machinery.  The standard states in 7.9 Safeguarding, 7.9.1 General, that the guards, safeguarding devices, awareness devices, and safeguarding methods on machinery shall conform to the applicable ANSI B11 machine-specific (Type-C) standard and/or ANSI B11.19.  ANSI provides standards for specific equipment including mechanical power presses as an example.  If there is no machine specific standard available, then ANSI B11.19, Performance Requirements for Risk Reduction Measures: Safeguarding and other Means of Reducing Risk is available.

ANSI B11.19-2019 (R2024) contains a specific section on guards, including fixed guards, movable guards, interlocked guards, adjustable guards, self-adjusting guards, partial guards, perimeter guards, nip guards, and shields. This standard can be used to assist the individual tasked with designing a guard.

Fixed Guard on Belts

International Standard ISO 14120 Safety of machinery – Guards – General requirements for the design and construction of fixed and movable guards is also available to assist in the design of guards for machinery.  Some sections included in this standard are “Principles for the design and construction of guards” and “Selection of types of guards.”

The individual tasked with designing a guard has several resources available to assist in the design.  Proper application can lead to a safer piece of equipment.

Chad Jones, PE, CFEI, CVFI, CMSE has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University. Chad has over 25 years of engineering experience including mechanical, process, and manufacturing engineering. This work has included equipment design, machine safeguarding, cost estimating and safety compliance. Chad also has over 15 years of commercial, industrial, and residential HVAC and plumbing design experience. A lifelong auto and motorcycle enthusiast, Chad is accomplished in the maintenance, repair, and modification of vehicles and engines. Chad is a Certified Fire and Explosion Investigator, Certified Vehicle Fire Investigator, and IFSAC certified Firefighter II in Greenwood County, South Carolina.

Author

Safety Hazards in Waterjet Cutting

Author

Waterjet cutting machines (often simply called ‘waterjets’ in the industry) are essentially platforms that use ultra-high pressure water to manufacture cut parts with accuracy as high as .001 inch. They can cut materials ranging from glass and stone to steel and even plastics. Such machines can cost under $1.00 per minute to run, even including labor. Waterjets are some of the most versatile cutting tools available today. They produce virtually no heat-affected zone. They also use CNC (computer numerically controlled) programs, which allow continuously variable speeds for different edge conditions and cut quality. The waterjet dissipates heat, and the jet stream minimizes harmful chemical vaporization from cut materials. Small and mid-sized companies throughout the U.S. depend on these powerful tools to manage all sorts of custom two-dimensional cuts.

But waterjets present unique hazards to the manufacturing environment. The following challenges require special attention: Read More

Machinery Directive VS Machinery Regulation – A Notable Change

Author

In 2023, the new European Machinery Regulation was published which replaces the 2006 Machinery Directive.  The 2023 Machinery Regulation is slated to be entered into force and application on January 20, 2027.  A number of changes and/or clarifications are included in this new Machinery Regulation, not the least of which is the definition for “substantial modification.” Read More

WARREN Welcomes Mechanical Engineer Brian Tenace, M.S.M.E., P.E.

Author

Brian’s Areas of Expertise Include:

Read More

Safety Distance in Machine Safeguarding

Author

Hazard can be defined as a potential source of harm.  Machine safeguarding seeks to protect people from these potential sources of harm.  Often distance from a hazard will play a key role in providing a means of protection.

One would often think of distance as it relates to the location of a barrier guard from a hazard.  ANSI B11.19, Performance Criteria for Safeguarding, defines safety distance as “the distance a safeguard is installed from a hazard such that individuals are not exposed to a hazard.”  An example from ANSI B11.19 of the recommended distance of a slotted opening in a barrier guard from a hazard is shown Read More

Turkey Fryers- Product Design is Critical to Consumer Safety

Author

As the holiday season nears, thoughts turn to wonderful home-cooked meals with family.  Few things in life are more pleasurable than a traditional holiday turkey feast. Yet for an unfortunate few, holiday meal time can turn tragic if a turkey frying accident occurs.   While fried turkeys may be tasty, many fire safety experts feel that the reward is not worth the risk.  Read More

HEY…Cover Up Please!

Author

Machine guards can be compared to the clothes we wear every day.  Indeed, they serve a very important purpose.  Imagine someone leaving their home on a fine, sunny morning wearing nothing but a smile.  Wonder how far they will get through the day before things start going poorly for this individual?

 

 

 

 

 

There will be more than a few raised eyebrows and blushes when he stops into the local Starbucks for his usual morning double-dipped and whipped, chocolaty chip with a touch of pumpkin spice cappuccino fix.  Good luck with that!  Probably going to leave disappointed, empty-handed, and likely wearing handcuffs.  This will be the beginning of a very long, very bad day for that individual.  Had he recognized the risks associated with this type of behavior, and then put forth a little effort to cover up, he would have prevented many unfavorable and possibly life-changing personal and legal problems from ever occurring!

And so it is with properly guarding a machine.  Machine safeguarding helps to protect workers from preventable injuries. Read More

WARREN Welcomes Mechanical Engineer Bob Hickman, P.E.

Author

Please join us in welcoming Mechanical Engineer Bob Hickman, P.E., to the WARREN family! Bob has over 30 years of manufacturing and machine design experience in production and quality-driven environments. Bob holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University.

Bob’s Areas of Expertise Include:
-Machine Safeguarding
-Machine Design
-Equipment Failure
-Mechanical Engineering
-Industrial Accident Investigation
-Codes & Standards
-Machinery & Equipment Damage Assessment
-Products Liability Read More

The Concepts of Hazard, Risk, and Harm in Machine Safeguarding

Author

Hazard, risk, and harm are terms that are used in the world of machine safeguarding.   How do these words shape the concept of machine safeguarding? Let’s look a little deeper….

Hazard, which Merriam-Webster defines as a noun, lists its first meaning as a source of danger.

1: a source of danger

2athe effect of unpredictable and unanalyzable forces in determining events CHANCERISK

  b:  a chance event ACCIDENT  Read More

Conveyor Backstops: Sometimes One Isn’t Enough, Part 2

This is the second in a two-part blog series about conveying equipment that severely injured a worker at a mine. In case you missed it, click here to read Part 1 where I describe the incident and the mining equipment. In this part, I will discuss my engineering analysis of the incident and the machinery involved and share the conclusions I reached.

The injured miner was a front-end loader operator. He was not a maintenance worker. He simply responded to a radio request for help with the conveyor. Power to the electric conveyor motors was locked out, but none of the maintenance workers did anything to lock out or block the hazardous gravitational potential energy in the heavy load of stone on the belt. Read More

Type ofLoss

Not sure what you're looking for?
Browse All

Select Loss Category